Click on the link below and the ‘full screen’ box
at the bottom right of the video:

http://silverandgoldandthee.net/V/Lil.html

http://defendmichael.wordpress.com/

http://www.wten.com/Global/story.asp?S=11190850

Posted: Sep 24, 2009 08:58 AM MDT

http://www.wten.com/Global/story.asp?S=11190850

Related Video NEWS10 EXCLUSIVE: VFW enacts its own judgement against flag burner (09/23/09)

September 8, 2009

Washington, D.C. — The Obama administration stunned national security experts recently with the creation of a new terrorism interrogation unit that will be overseen by the White House, thus stripping the CIA of its oversight in interrogating key terror suspects. The new White House interrogation unit will be supervised by President Obama’s National Security Council. According to a just-released Zogby International/O’Leary Report Poll, a majority of American voters, including a majority of Independents, think President Obama’s decision is a “bad idea.”

The Zogby/O’Leary Poll surveyed 4,518 voters August 28-31 and has a margin-of-error of plus-or-minus 1.5 percentage points. The sample was weighted to reflect the exact outcome of the 2008 Presidential Election (i.e. 53 percent Obama voters and 47 percent McCain voters. The Poll asked:

The Obama administration has moved the responsibility for interrogating terrorists from the CIA to the White House, where the National Security Director will oversee interrogations. Do you think this move is a good idea or a bad idea?

A majority of American voters (52 percent) think Obama’s move is a bad idea, while only 29 percent think it is a good idea (19 percent are not sure). A clear majority of Independent voters (56 percent) think the Obama administration’s move is a bad idea, and just 25 percent think it is a good idea. A plurality of young voters age 18-29 (48 percent) think it is a bad idea, and 28 percent think it’s a good idea.

According to Brad O’Leary, author and publisher of The O’Leary Report (www.olearyreport.com) the majority of Americans opposed to this recent move by the Obama administration also likely reflects their opposition to the Administration’s decision to hire a special prosecutor to go after CIA interrogators.

“These interrogators helped keep America safe from terrorist attacks for the past eight years,” said O’Leary. “That the President and his administration would treat them like criminals, and go so far as to strip them from their duties, clearly doesn’t sit well with most Americans.”

O’Leary is also concerned that putting a high-level terror interrogation unit under the direct supervision of the White House sets a bad precedent by injecting politics into a serious national security matter.

“Though this new interrogation unit will be located at the FBI, the White House National Security Council will exercise direct oversight over the unit,” O’Leary explained.

“No longer will CIA experts be supervising crucial interrogations with terror suspects, but rather, President Obama’s close advisors will be making those calls. Competency is certainly a big issue, but so is the possibility that high-level terror interrogations will now be subject to White House politics.”

Washington, D.C. — The Obama administration stunned national security experts recently with the creation of a new terrorism interrogation unit that will be overseen by the White House, thus stripping the CIA of its oversight in interrogating key terror suspects. The new White House interrogation unit will be supervised by President Obama’s National Security Council. According to a just-released Zogby International/O’Leary Report Poll, a majority of American voters, including a majority of Independents, think President Obama’s decision is a “bad idea.”

The Zogby/O’Leary Poll surveyed 4,518 voters August 28-31 and has a margin-of-error of plus-or-minus 1.5 percentage points. The sample was weighted to reflect the exact outcome of the 2008 Presidential Election (i.e. 53 percent Obama voters and 47 percent McCain voters. The Poll asked:

The Obama administration has moved the responsibility for interrogating terrorists from the CIA to the White House, where the National Security Director will oversee interrogations. Do you think this move is a good idea or a bad idea?

A majority of American voters (52 percent) think Obama’s move is a bad idea, while only 29 percent think it is a good idea (19 percent are not sure). A clear majority of Independent voters (56 percent) think the Obama administration’s move is a bad idea, and just 25 percent think it is a good idea. A plurality of young voters age 18-29 (48 percent) think it is a bad idea, and 28 percent think it’s a good idea.

—–clip————-

Details of a revamped version of the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 show the Senate bill could give the president a “kill switch” on the Internet and allow him to shut out private networks from online access.

Senate bill would offer President Obama emergency control of the Internet and may give him a “kill switch” to shut down online traffic by seizing private networks — a move cybersecurity experts worry will choke off industry and civil liberties.

Details of a revamped version of the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 emerged late Thursday, months after an initial version authored by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.V., was blasted in Silicon Valley as dangerous government intrusion.

“In the original bill they empowered the president to essentially turn off the Internet in the case of a ‘cyber-emergency,’ which they didn’t define,” said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which represents the telecommunications industry.

“We think it’s a very bad idea … to put in legislation,” he told FOXNews.com.

Clinton said the new version of the bill that surfaced this week is improved from its first draft, but troubling language that was removed was replaced by vague language that could still offer the same powers to the president in case of an emergency.

“The current language is so unclear that we can’t be confident that the changes have actually been made,” he said.

The new legislation allows the president to “declare a cybersecurity emergency” relating to “non-governmental” computer networks and make a plan to respond to the danger, according to an excerpt published online — a broad license that rights experts worry would give the president “amorphous powers” over private users.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/…

http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/08/21/troops.maltreatment/

WASHINGTON (CNN) — Four U.S. soldiers have been charged with cruelty and maltreatment of four subordinates in Iraq after a suicide investigation brought to light alleged wrongdoing, the military said Friday.

There is no confirmed evidence that the suicide, which involved a fifth subordinate in the unit, was a result of any mistreatment, said Lt. Col. Kevin Olson, a spokesman for Multi-National Division-South, who said the military is looking into that possibility.

Charges were brought Wednesday against three sergeants and a specialist with the 13th Cavalry Regiment out of Fort Bliss, Texas, accusing them of engaging in “verbal abuse, physical punishment and ridicule of subordinates,” according to Olson. He described the physical punishment as falling into the category of “undue calisthenics.”

“Accusations of cruelty and maltreatment are taken very seriously, and we will investigate this isolated incident thoroughly,” said Brig. Gen. David Elicerio, deputy commanding general for Multi-National Division-South.

Olson said the Army does not believe the maltreatment of subordinates went beyond the soldiers’ unit.

The four were identified as:

Staff Sgt. Enoch Chatman, who is charged with four counts of cruelty and maltreatment, one count of making a false statement and one count of reckless endangerment. If convicted on all charges, he could be sentenced to 10 years in jail.

Staff Sgt. Bob Clements, who is charged with four counts of cruelty and maltreatment, three counts of making false statements, one count of reckless endangerment and one count of impeding an investigation. If convicted on all charges, he could face 25 years in jail.

Sgt. Jarrett Taylor, who is charged with two counts of cruelty and maltreatment, one count of making false statements and one count of reckless endangerment. If convicted on all charges, he could be jailed for eight years.

Spc. David Weber, who is charged with three counts of cruelty and maltreatment, one count of reckless endangerment and one count of impeding an investigation. If convicted on all counts, he could face nine years in jail.
All four soldiers have been removed from their unit.

Olson said Army officials have spoken to the four subordinate soldiers and are offering them any help they need.

The suicide investigation began on August 4, Olson said.

On that day, a Defense Department news release said that Pvt. Keiffer P. Wilhelm, 19, of Plymouth, Ohio, died in Iraq of injuries sustained from a noncombat-related incident. He was assigned to a unit from the 1st Armored Division at Fort Bliss, the release said.

The Veterans’ Voice

 
     Yes, the program was not aired Sunday so it
     was googled and found the segments had been
     taken off of the internet as well.  Wonder who did this?
     Wonder who blocked this?   Is this our NEW Government
     protecting us?

     Here are the 6 segments  if they haven’t been
     removed before you get to them. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rthv8QmJLUw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJNhKZh8mGY&feature=fvw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95XFUi8PrTs&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gl4twMf1xyM&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKzFtKEysjw&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmEmRbRJFLU&feature=related